A bitter High Court dispute has broken out concerning potential neighbours more than the construction of the wall in a coastal website in the north Dublin suburb, a circumstance that has attracted nationwide notice subsequent an Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed family members property at Sutton Strand, where by allegations of preparing breaches, environmental worries, and very long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Times article about René Collier plus the Irish Instances report about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a neighborhood disagreement has developed into a very publicised legal battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than construction functions at the positioning on Dublin Road, Sutton, exactly where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a company director respectively, seek to make their family dwelling. The situation is becoming emblematic of wider disputes together Eire’s coastline, in which improvement pressures collide with environmental protections and also the sensitivities of established inhabitants. Based on the Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall being produced by their potential neighbours goes beyond the boundaries permitted less than arranging authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both equally residents of Dublin Highway, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases of their arranging permission by creating a wall beyond the boundaries of their site, resulting in an encroachment with a Particular Area of Conservation. The SAC designation is central on the dispute, therefore places are issue to stringent controls less than European and Irish environmental law. Inside their court docket filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even small encroachments could have Long lasting ecological consequences, notably in a sensitive coastal setting such as Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They may be in breach in their scheduling authorization, and say the wall, that is partially created, is in the proper posture. Their legal group has characterised the action as an try to delay or frustrate a lawful growth. The pair accuse litigants of trying to get to halt homebuilding as a way to protect their look at, an allegation that's been recurring in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of many coastal preparing disputes, exactly where views of The ocean are both of those highly prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained extraordinary endeavours via the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded as a result of ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, according to sworn proof referenced from the Irish Periods. In one account, Rene Collier waded by means of waist-high h2o through a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Instances, a picture which has given that turn out to be emblematic of the depth from the dispute. These steps were not basically symbolic; they ended up intended to Assemble visual proof on the wall’s position relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site from the sea Irish Periods noted, describing how The 2 Guys entered the h2o through extreme climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by means of storm h2o to photograph the website turned Just about the most putting descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Situations write-up about accountant Paul Feely pointed out that these types of actions were being cited to show the plaintiffs’ belief the wall prolonged into a region affected by tidal movement, strengthening their argument that the SAC was currently being encroached on.
The events at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been lined in detail because of the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Instances January 27 2026 grew to become broadly searched phrases as viewers sought to be familiar with the history and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court read further more submissions on whether or not interim orders must be granted to halt development pending a complete hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a critical minute during the lawful timeline.
Within the Main on the dispute is often a disagreement in excess of boundaries, arranging compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely keep the wall, as built, goes beyond what was approved and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, is described as meticulous in his assessment of arranging documents, maps, and conditions connected for the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both equally stressed that their motion is inspired by issue for environmental defense and adherence to preparing regulation. They reject statements that the situation is about preserving a private perspective, insisting as a substitute that it is about guaranteeing that improvement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limits. In affidavits, they may have described their very long-standing connection to the world and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On one other side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a pair just endeavoring to develop a spouse and children residence in accordance While using the law. They deny the wall encroaches over a Special Spot of Conservation and say that every one works are already performed based on Skilled assistance and approved strategies. Their attorneys have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the spectacular steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, together with entering the sea in the course of a storm, tend not to alter the underlying points.
The situation has also lifted broader questions on how setting up disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute in excess of development of wall at coastal web-site has grown to be a shorthand description for your condition a large number of observers see as ever more widespread. As sea stages rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation between non-public land, community foreshore, and guarded habitats is now extra contentious.
The Irish Periods report about René Collier famous that the businessman experienced Formerly been linked to community advocacy on arranging and environmental concerns, though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Occasions article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people today from quite various professional backgrounds can find them selves aligned in these disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some studies spell their names, have become synonymous Along with the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location in the sea Irish Times coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded via waistline-high water through a storm to photograph the website Irish Periods and René Collier waded through waist-substantial h2o throughout a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Periods are phrases that appeared repeatedly in coverage, reflecting the two the Bodily fact of your coastline and also the René Collier waded through waist-high water during a storm to photograph the site Irish Times symbolic character on the act. For supporters with the plaintiffs, these steps shown determination; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an excessive approach.
Because the High Court proceedings proceed, the end result remains uncertain. The court must figure out whether the wall as constructed complies with preparing permission and whether or not any encroachment into a Distinctive Space of Conservation has happened. The authorized arguments are sophisticated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal knowledge, and organizing situations. But the human component continues to be central: neighbours who ought to Stay alongside one another very long following the legal expenses happen to be compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about building functions at the site on Dublin Street, Sutton, nevertheless the implications of the situation lengthen beyond that tackle. For planners, developers, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves as being a reminder of the necessity of clarity in arranging permissions and sensitivity in coastal development. In addition it underscores how speedily a local disagreement can escalate when basic problems for instance environmental protection and residence legal rights are perceived to get at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains a spot of purely natural splendor and contested boundaries. The wall in the centre on the dispute stands partly developed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved lawful queries. Whether it's going to in the long run be altered, eradicated, or completed as planned will depend upon the courtroom’s conclusions. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will probably keep on to seem in headlines, joined indelibly to one of the most closely watched preparing disputes in north Dublin in recent times.